Research for the Benefit of SMEs (R4S) 2012 – orientation (working) paper has been published!

Following agreement at the Programme Committee meeting last Friday, an announcement has been made on the Techweb site at http://ec.europa.eu/research/sme-techweb/index_en.cfm?pg=news releasing news of the draft Work Programme for 2013 call, due to be announced 10th July.

Publication of the orientation paper prepared in connection with the FP7 2013 Work Programme for Research for the benefit of SMEs

This paper is made public on the Participant Portal at an early stage in the adoption process of the work programme to provide potential applicants with the currently expected main lines of the 2013 work programme. It is a working document not yet endorsed by the Commission and its content does not in any way prejudge the subsequent modifications by the Commission, nor the final decision of the Commission.
Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7) | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Euro-Mediterranean Collaboration

Euro-Mediterranean governments aim to tackle the top sources of Mediterranean pollution by the year 2020 through the Horizon 2020 initiative that is built around 4 elements:

  • Projects to reduce the most significant pollution sources focussing on industrial emissions, municipal waste and urban waste water, responsible for up to 80% of pollution in the Mediterranean Sea
  • Capacity-building measures to help neighbouring countries create national environmental administrations that are able to develop and police environmental laws.
  • Using the Commission’s Research budget to develop and share knowledge of environmental issues relevant to the Mediterranean.
  • Developing indicators to monitor the success of Horizon 2020.

The initiative is open to all stakeholders and calls for the mobilisation of the necessary financial resources and the provision of technical support from all partners. All stakeholders are invited to work together to maximise assistance, exploit opportunities and meet the commitments of the timetable.

Posted in Horizon 2020 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Start Up Loans for Young Entrepreneurs (UK)

When can I apply?

You can apply for a StartUp Loan from 28 May 2012.

To whom do I apply?

The StartUp Loan distribution partners will be announced shortly and you can choose the loan provider that suits you best.

Am I eligible?

To apply for a loan, you should be older than 18 and younger than 24, living in England and thinking about starting a business.

What is the application process?

This may differ depending on the StartUp Loan provider you choose to go with but, in most cases, it will involve submitting a business plan on which your application will be based. You may also be invited to talk through your business or idea in person.

What kind of loan is it?

The StartUp Loan is a personal loan.

If I receive a StartUp Loan, what are the payback terms? You will be required to pay back the loan within three to five years at a fixed APR (annual percentage rate) of 3% plus RPI (Retail Price Index) which is currently 3.5%.

I already have a student loan. Can I apply for a StartUp Loan as well? Yes, you can apply for a StartUp Loan.

What else do I receive?

As well as the loan, you receive business support and mentoring and a free copy of the StartUp Loans Kit, which offers all the guidance you need to start a business plus over £500-worth of offers on products from business cards to websites, netbooks and work suits.

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

EC FP8 Funding- Horizon 2020 – Everything you want to know

 

Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7), Horizon 2020 | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FP7 Expected Funding Calls and Deadlines – 2012

COOPERATION
Health
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-HEALTH-2013 Health July 2012 Sept/Oct 2012 Contact NCP
Orientation Paper
Food Agri Biotech
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-KBBE-2013-7 KBBE July 2012 open Contact NCP
Orientation Paper
ICT
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-2012-ICT-FI ICT 18 May 2012 24 Oct 2012 Contact NCP
NMP
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-NMP-2013 NMP July 2012 open Contact NCP
FP7-2013-EeB NMP July 2012 open Contact NCP
FP7-2013-FoF NMP July 2012 open Contact NCP
FP7-2013-GC-MATERIALS NMP July 2012 open Contact NCP
NMP Orientation Paper 2013
Energy
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-ENERGY-2013 Energy July 2012 open Contact NCP
Orientation Paper
Environment
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-ENV-2013 ENV July 2012 open Contact NCP
FP7-2013-EeB ENV July 2012 open Contact NCP
FP7-2013-GC-MATERIALS ENV July 2012 open Contact NCP
ENV Orientation Paper 2013
Ocean of Tomorrow Orientation Paper 2013
Transport
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-TRANSPORT-2013 Transport July 2012 open Contact NCP
Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-SSH-2013 SSH July 2012 open Contact NCP
Space
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-SPACE-2013 Space July 2012 open Contact NCP
Orientation Paper
Security
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-SEC-2013 Security July 2012 open Contact NCP
Orientation Paper
IDEAS
ERC
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
ERC- 2013-StG ERC Starting Grant 10 July 2012 17 Oct 2012 Contact NCP
ERC-2013-CoG ERC Consolidator Grant 7 Nov 2012 21 Feb 2013 Contact NCP
ERC-2013-AdG ERC Advanced Grant 10 July 2012 22 Nov 2012 Contact NCP
ERC-2013-SyG ERC Synergy Grant 10 Oct 2012 10 Jan 2013 Contact NCP
ERC-2013-PoC Proof of Concept Grant 10 Jan 2013 24 April 2013
3 Oct 2013
Contact NCP
ERC-2013-Support-1 Coordination and Support Action 1 Oct 2012 14 Jan 2013 Contact NCP
ERC-2013-Support-2 Coordination and Support Action final quarter of 2012 final quarter of 2012 Contact NCP
PEOPLE
Marie Curie Actions
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN Mobility 13 July 2012 Nov 2012 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-COFUND Mobility 13 July 2012 5 Dec 2012 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES Mobility 13 July 2012 17 Jan 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-NIGHT Mobility 2 Oct 2012 10 Jan 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IAPP Mobility 2 Oct 2012 15 Jan 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG Mobility 18 Oct 2012 7 March 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF Mobility 14 March 2013 14 Aug 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IIF Mobility 14 March 2013 14 Aug 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IOF Mobility 14 March 2013 14 Aug 2013 Contact NCP
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG Mobility 18 Oct 2012 5 Sept 2013 Contact NCP
CAPACITIES
Research Infrastructures
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2013-1 Research Infrastructures July 2012 open Contact NCP
Research for the benefit of SMEs
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-SME-2013 Research for SMEs July 2012 open Contact NCP
Regions of knowledge
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
NO EXPECTED CALL
Science in Society
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-SCIENCE-IN-SOCIETY-2013 SIS July 2012 open Contact NCP
INCO
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Expected publication Date Expected Deadline Further information
FP7-INCO-2013 INCO July 2012 open Contact NCP
Joint Undertakings
Official call identifier Thematic Domain Publication Date Official Deadline Call fiche
Clean Sky Call 13 Clean Sky 12 July 2012 open Contact NCP
Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7) | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

JumpStart – Funding for London SMEs

JumpStart

Managed by: London Development Agency

What is it for? Support for innovative business projects‚

Who can apply? London based SMEs‚

 

What is available? Various – see below

Details

The aim of Jumpstart is to encourage organisations to improve the productivity and efficiency of their businesses through the introduction of an Innovative product and/or service. The projects are targeted at organisations that have a specific innovative project idea that addresses significant barriers to their business. The JumpStart Programme is designed to address three areas of activity where additional focus and attention is needed and will provide sufficient impact:

Connect: funding is provided for innovation partnerships between SMEs and knowledge centres. Connect aims to address the imbalance caused by the failure of London´s businesses to engage and exploit the knowledge and resources which is readily available in colleges, universities and centres of creativity and research.

Inspire: will break down barriers to innovation for London´s minority businesses by supporting the developments that will inspire, unlock opportunity and foster innovation, creativity and enterprise in London´s diverse minority business.

Engage: focuses on strengthening innovation and knowledge to improve networks across London and the promotion of the capital as an innovative centre.

The Programme offers:

  • Up to 50% of project costs with a maximum of £10 000 for London-based Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to connect with Higher education Institutes (HEIs) or Research and Technology Organisations (RTOs);
  • Up to £100 000 to inspire London´s minority business communities to improve access and uptake of innovation;
  • Up to £1 million to strengthen and enhance new and existing networks to promote London as a centre for Innovation and strengthen engagement of businesses in innovation.

More info: London Development Agency

Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7), Horizon 2020, Technology | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SPIE Photonics Europe – 16-19 April 2012 – Free Entry!

A presentation on the new European Commission framework programme Horizon 2020 will lead off talks at the upcoming SPIE Photonics Europe international congress on materials, nanotechnology, biophotonics, semiconductors, lasers, multimedia, and imaging. Offering more than 1,400 technical presentations, a free-admission exhibition, Photonics Innovation Village competition, and numerous networking events, the meeting will be held at the Square Brussels Meeting Centre 16-19 April.

“Photonics Europe brings together different disciplines, technologies, and perspectives from across Europe and around the world” said Francis Berghmans (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). “Many of the toughest issues facing optical and photonics technologies today have been selected as the basis of its programmes. These current research issues will drive the development of new products for years to come.”

Berghmans is one of four General Chairs of the event, along with Ronan Burgess (European Commission), Jürgen Popp (Institute of Photonic Technology Jena), and Peter Hartmann (SCHOTT AG). Hugo Thienpont (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) is Honorary Chair.

Technical presentations are organised into 18 conferences on topics in optics, photonics, and imaging such as

  •     Metamaterials
  •     Photonic crystal materials and devices
  •     Biophotonics
  •     Nanophotonics
  •     Silicon photonics and photonic integrated circuits
  •     Lasers and amplifier technologies
  •     Optical sensing and detection
  •     Organic photonics.

 

Hot topics speakers will provide overviews of important developments in photonics across multiple disciplines. Presenters are:

  •     Thierry Van der Pyl, EC Information Society and Media Directorate, on the role photonics research and innovation will play in the new Horizon 2020 funding programme
  •     John Dudley, Université de Franche-Comté, on breakthroughs in nonlinear optics
  •     Kyriacos Kalli, Nanophotonics Research Laboratory at Cyprus University of Technology, on next-generation fibre lasers
  •     Andreas Tünnermann, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institute of Applied Physics, and Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Optics and Precision Engineering, on advances in high-power fibre laser systems
  •     Demetri Psaltis, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, on optofluidics for solar energy
  •     Lihong Wang, Washington University in St. Louis, on photoacoustic tomography
  •     Finlay Colville, Solarbuzz, on manufacturing of silicon solar cells and thin-film panels
  •     Berit Wessler, OSRAM, on solid state lighting.

 

Opportunities for industry

An industry programme will provide an overview of opportunities in photonics markets as well as a report from the recently formed ASPICE (Action to Support Photonic Innovation Clusters in Europe), organised to enhance collaboration and success among national clusters and platforms across Europe.

Industry-focused workshops include:

  •     Integrated approaches to study of historical glass, sponsored by the New Archaeological Research Network for Integrating Approaches to Ancient Material Studies (NARNIA)
  •     Properties of optical glass and special optical materials, presented by SCHOTT with Peter Hartmann as lecturer
  •     Plasmonics in the Infrared workshop, sponsored by the FP7 project PLAISIR
  •     Advanced opto-electronic simulation, from devices to photonic integrated circuits, presented by Lovalite and Lumerical.

 

Preregistration ― free to technical conference attendees ― is required for the industry workshops.

Leading photonics companies will showcase their latest equipment and systems in the three-day exhibition featuring optical components, lasers, fibre optics, detectors, sensors, and cameras. Conference attendees may visit the exhibition Monday through Wednesday, and exhibition-only visitors may attend on Tuesday 17 April.

A highlight of the exhibition will be the fifth Photonics Innovation Village ―a look at creative new photonics-based products, the young innovators who are developing them, and research programmes encouraging the transfer of optics and photonics research into products. Organised by B-PHOT, the Brussels Photonics Team at Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the competition this year includes 16 products from throughout Europe. Awards sponsored by Brussels-Capital Region will be given for the top products.

Networking and more

Activities designed to provide students with networking opportunities and to develop vital career skills include a student chapter leadership workshop, student chapter exhibition, networking lunch with experts, and professional development program.

Among other networking opportunities at Photonics Europe are the SPIE Fellows luncheon, a Women in Optics networking luncheon, evening poster receptions, and a welcome reception at the Royal Museum of Art and History.

For more on SPIE Photonics Europe visit http://spie.org/photonics-europe.xml.

Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7), Horizon 2020 | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Horizon 2020 – FAQ for the FP8 Programme

Q: What are the key features of Horizon 2020 and its Rules which will make it simpler to participate in?

A: Simplification in Horizon 2020 will target three overarching goals: reducing the administrative costs of the participants; accelerating all processes of proposal and grant management and decreasing the financial error rate.

These general objectives will be achieved along several dimensions:

  • Structural simplification, which is provided through a simpler programme architecture, bringing together all research and innovation funding in one programme. This includes a single set of participation rules covering all components of the programme.
  • Simpler funding rules, which will make the preparation of proposals and the management of projects easier. At the same time, they will reduce the number of financial errors.

T he following approach is proposed:

  • Simplified reimbursement of real direct costs, with a broader acceptance of beneficiaries’ usual accounting practices;
  • The possibility of using unit personnel costs (average personnel costs) for beneficiaries for which this is their usual accounting method, and for SME owners without a salary;
  • Simplification of time-recording by providing a clear and simple set of minimum conditions, in particular abolition of time-recording obligations for staff working full time on the EU project;
  • Only two reimbursement rates for all types of participants: 100% for research activities, 70% for piloting and demonstration;
  • One single flat rate of 20% to cover indirect costs, instead of the current four methods for calculation;
  • Continuation of the system of unit costs and flat rates for mobility and training actions (Marie Curie);
  • Output-based funding with lump sums for whole projects in specific areas.

Revised control strategy, which takes into account the policy objective of achieving a new balance between trust and control and reducing the administrative burden:

  • On the ex-ante side, the guarantee fund will cover all actions under Horizon 2020, leading to fewer ex-ante financial capacity checks and a reduced number of certificates on financial statements;
  • Ex-ante financial capacity checks in Horizon 2020 will be required only for coordinators (i.e. abolition of the threshold of EUR 500000 for other partners), reducing thus further the number of ex-ante checks;
  • Voluntary ex-ante certification of accounting methodologies of organisations using unit personnel costs will be offered, as means for preventing errors and for providing ex-ante assurance;
  • The focus of the ex-post audits will shift from a minimisation of the residual error rate towards risk-based audit and fraud detection. The overall number of ex-post audits will be limited with the Commission considering that as general guidance, a maximum of 7% of participants in Horizon 2020 would be subject to audit over the whole programming period.

As a result, the Commission deems it possible to reduce the average time to grant in Horizon 2020 with 100 days as compared to the current situation.

Further simplification of research and innovation funding will result from the revision of the Financial Regulation (e.g. no declaration of interest on pre-financing, eligibility of VAT, limitation of extrapolation of systematic errors).

The whole set of practical arrangements for proposal and project implementation will also be revisited and streamlined. This includes the detailed provisions on the content and shape of proposals, the processes for turning proposals into projects, the requirements for reporting and monitoring, as well as the related guidance documents and support services. A major contribution to reduced administrative costs for participation will come from a single user-friendly IT platform for all interactions with participants, based on the FP7 Participant Portal.

Q: What is the rationale for applying the same funding rate for all types of participants?

A: The current situation under FP7 is defined by a complex matrix of funding rates, methods for determining indirect costs, activities and categories of legal entities (according to the legal status granted after validation by the services of the Unique Registration Facility). This complexity is difficult to explain, leads to long delays (in particular in the grant negotiation phase), hampers the expected flexibility in project implementation, and requires permanent maintenance of the legal status information, with a complex system for handling amendments.

Having a single reimbursement rate for all types of participants (together with a single flat rate for indirect costs) will considerably reduce:

  • the length and complexity of guidance documents and the number of requests addressed to the help-desks;
  • the administrative costs, in particular for coordinators having to manage the previous complex system (as changes to consortium composition, distribution of work packages etc. will not entail difficult budget operations as it was now the case due to the variety of reimbursement rates and indirect cost methods applied by different organisations in the consortium);
  • the time-to-grant, as the validation of legal entities (particularly SMEs) and establishment of budgets of collaborative projects by the consortia will be simpler;
  • the number of financial errors (an analysis of errors identified during audits of FP7 suggests that around 25-35% of them would be avoided by the simplification measures proposed, and the error rate can then be expected to fall by 1.5%, i.e. from close to current 5% to around 3.5%)

Q: Why does Horizon 2020 put more emphasis on using financial instruments (equity and debt) to support SMEs and other participants?

A: The two main EU financial instruments currently supporting research and innovation have been very successful. For debt, the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) combines EU budgetary resources and EIB funding to share the risks associated with investing in projects: EUR 1 billion comes from the FP7 budget, and another EUR 1 billion from the resources of the European Investment Bank. RSFF loans are available to public and private sector promoters of any size and ownership from the Member States and the countries associated to FP7. By mid-2011, funding for 91 projects worth over EUR 9 billion had been approved. A specific facility for SMEs will start up in early 2012. For equity, the High-Growth and Innovative SME Facility (GIF) under the CIP invests in specialised funds that provide venture capital for SME financing. Managed by the EIF, the GIF covers both early and growth-stage investments. By the end of 2010, some EUR 222 million had been committed to 19 funds supporting a target fund size of some EUR 1.5 billion.

Greater use of financial instruments will help leverage yet further private research and innovation investments, including venture capital investments for innovative, high-tech companies, and in particular SMEs. In Horizon 2020, financial instruments will be expanded in both scope and scale. A debt facility will provide loans and guarantees, and an equity facility will provide finance for early and growth stage investments. Their aim will be to support the achievement of the R&I objectives of all sectors and policy areas crucial for tackling societal challenges, enhancing competitiveness and fostering sustainable growth. They will be implemented via a mandate to, or a partnership with, the European Investment Bank group and/or other international financial institutions and national intermediaries.

Summery of current Key Horizon 2020 Financial Plans:

  • Reimbursement via eligible direct costs continues
  • Use of usual accounting practices is strengthened
  • Possibility to use average personnel costs in some circumstances
  • Time-recording will have specific rules
  • Proposed Funding rates for activities:
  • Research activities – 100%
  • Piloting and demonstration – 70%
  • Indirect Costs / Overheads will be a flat rate of 20%
  • Lump Sums funding method to be introduced
  • Guarantee Fund to Continue
  • Ex-ante financial capacity checks only to apply to Coordinators
  • Less Audits

Please note that all Horizon 2020 information is still labelled as “draft”. I will keep you updated as soon as more information is available from Brussels.

Posted in Horizon 2020 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Emerging Technologies – Electroencephalography (EEG)

Electroencephalography (EEG) is the recording of electrical activity along the scalp. EEG measures voltage fluctuations resulting from ionic current flows within the neurons of the brain. In clinical contexts, EEG refers to the recording of the brain’s spontaneous electrical activity over a short period of time, usually 20–40 minutes, as recorded from multiple electrodes placed on the scalp. In neurology, the main diagnostic application of EEG is in the case of epilepsy, as epileptic activity can create clear abnormalities on a standard EEG study.A secondary clinical use of EEG is in the diagnosis of coma, encephalopathies, and brain death. EEG used to be a first-line method for the diagnosis of tumors, stroke and other focal brain disorders, but this use has decreased with the advent of anatomical imaging techniques with high (<1 mm) spatial resolution such as MRI and CT. Despite limited spatial resolution, EEG continues to be a valuable tool for research and diagnosis, especially when millisecond-range temporal resolution (not possible with CT or MRI) is required.

Derivatives of the EEG technique include evoked potentials (EP), which involves averaging the EEG activity time-locked to the presentation of a stimulus of some sort (visual, somatosensory, or auditory). Event-related potentials (ERPs) refer to averaged EEG responses that are time-locked to more complex processing of stimuli; this technique is used in cognitive science, cognitive psychology, and psychophysiological research.

EE, and the related study of ERPs are used extensively in neuroscience, cognitive science, cognitive psychology, and psychophysiological research. Many EEG techniques used in research are not standardized sufficiently for clinical use.

A different method to study brain function is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Some advantages of EEG over fMRI include:

  • Hardware costs are significantly lower
  • EEG sensors can be used in more places than a bulky, immobile fMRI machine can
  • EEG has higher temporal resolution – milliseconds, rather than seconds
  • EEG is relatively tolerant of subject movement (in fMRI the subject must remain completely still)
  • EEG is silent, which allows for better study of the responses to auditory stimuli
  • EEG does not aggravate claustrophobia
  • EEG does not involve exposure to high-intensity (>1 Tesla) magnetic fields (as in MRI)

In addition, EEG does not involve exposure to radioligands (unlike positron emission tomography)

Disadvantages of EEG relative to fMRI include:

  • Significantly lower spatial resolution
  • ERP studies require relatively simple paradigms, compared with block-design fMRI studies

Simultaneous EEG recordings and fMRI scans have been obtained successfully, though successful simultaneous recording requires that several technical difficulties be overcome, such as the presence of ballistocardiographic artifact, MRI pulse artifact and the induction of electrical currents in EEG wires that move within the strong magnetic fields of the MRI.

EEG also has some characteristics that compare favorably with behavioral testing:

  • EEG can detect covert processing (i.e., processing that does not require a response)
  • EEG can be used in subjects who are incapable of making a motor response
  • Some ERP components can be detected even when the subject is not attending to the stimuli
  • Unlike other means of studying reaction time, ERPs can elucidate stages of processing (rather than just the final end result)

Limitations

EEG has several limitations. Most important is its poor spatial resolution. EEG is most sensitive to a particular set of post-synaptic potentials: those generated in superficial layers of the cortex, on the crests of gyri directly abutting the skull and radial to the skull. Dendrites, which are deeper in the cortex, inside sulci, in midline or deep structures (such as the cingulate gyrus or hippocampus), or producing currents that are tangential to the skull, have far less contribution to the EEG signal.

The meninges, cerebrospinal fluid and skull “smear” the EEG signal, obscuring its intracranial source.

It is mathematically impossible to reconstruct a unique intracranial current source for a given EEG signal, as some currents produce potentials that cancel each other out. This is referred to as the inverse problem. However, much work has been done to produce remarkably good estimates of, at least, a localized electric dipole that represents the recorded currents.

Posted in Technology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

R&D tax credits – Every little helps…

R&D tax credits are an incentive in the form of tax relief for companies of all sizes to raise their investment in R&D. The tax credits work by allowing companies to deduct qualifying expenditure on R&D activities when calculating their profit for tax purposes.  Alternatively, some companies with under 500 employees can claim cash back.

The Government intends to introduce an ‘above the line’ R&D tax credit, effective from April 2013, and will consult on details at Budget 2012. Under this change the R&D tax credit could be accounted for as a reduction in R&D spend – rather than just being reflected in the tax line of the company accounts. Any unused credit (i.e. if the company is loss making) would be payable to the company (rather than carried forward in losses to be offset once the company is profitable).
For the purposes of R&D tax credits, R&D can be defined as any project to resolve scientific or technological uncertainty aimed at achieving an advance in science or technology.  Advances include new or improved products, processes and services.

For more information, please get in touch.

Posted in European Commission Funding (FP7), Technology, Technology Strategy Board (TSB) Funding | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment